Saturday, April 2, 2011
Last Post
After much thought and personal deliberation I am discontinuing my Blog as Williams Lake CAO. I am doing this with some reservation as I believe there are readers who have enjoyed my postings. However, there are a number of important considerations that have contributed to my decision. When I first established my blog, I felt there was a gap in communication between City Hall and the community. We did not have a dedicated 'communications' function and for the most part, I was filling that role. I also felt our web site needed more to offer readers. Much has changed in the past year with the City hiring a Communications Coordinator. The gap in communication no longer exists as we now have capacity to provide consistent information to the public. We have also finalized a new web site which is set to come on line in mid April and will provide readers with a new look, improved format and enhanced information. More recently, I have become the target of some fairly prolific allegations and subsequent media interest. I recognize this is an occupational hazard in my line of work and I have no problem in shouldering the criticism and responding with the facts. However, I am also aware of the political undercurrents associated with some of the coverage and comentary and that is of concern to me. As CAO, I am responsible for administration of the City's operations, supporting our staff, fulfilling Council's policy direction and providing Council with technical and professional advice. Administration in local government has no role in the politics of local government. That is not to say that those of us in administration shouldn't be aware of, and tuned into the political scene as obviously it does affect our elected officials. Being on the political front line is the exclusive turf of the Mayor and Council and when Administration is drawn into the politics of local government, the credibility of Administration can be compromised. As much as I have enjoyed writing on my blog and sharing my perspectives with my readers, at this point I feel my time is best spent attending to the important work of moving the City's operations forward and supporting Council in their governance role. As always, if anyone has any questions or concerns with the administration of the City, my door at City is always open and I can be reached by phone or e-mail at bcarruthers@williamslake.ca
Friday, February 25, 2011
Official Community Plan
After many meetings and workshops, public events and written submissions, the City's Imagine our Future process wrapped up with Council's adoption of the Integrated Community Sustainability Plan (ICSP) in the summer of 2010. The ICSP provides a framework that will encourage and support integrated consideration of environmental, social and economic implications when Council makes decisions.
Since the summer, staff have been working to incorporate the ten key priority areas and land use objectives that were identified during the ICSP process, into the City's new Official Community Plan (OCP). The City's new OCP is very unique in that it deals with much more than the traditional land use and zoning issues that are found in an OCP. Together, the ten key priority areas represent the community's vision for an environmentally, socially and economically sustainable community.
The community is now being provided an opportunity to review and provide input to the draft OCP. City staff have already made presentations to a variety of groups in the community and many more presentations are planned for the weeks to come. In addition, staff will be attending a number of high-traffic public areas in order to reach members of the community who might not otherwise particpate in a structured consultation process.
The City of Williams Lake web site has a link to the draft OCP and the community is encouraged to review the document and provide their input.
An OCP is a legislated requirement that helps guide land use and other strategic decisions so that development takes place in a deliberate and sustainable manner. Given the broad scope of this OCP and the high level of public particpation, this plan should assist City Coucnil and the community in making sound, sustainable decisions in the future.
Since the summer, staff have been working to incorporate the ten key priority areas and land use objectives that were identified during the ICSP process, into the City's new Official Community Plan (OCP). The City's new OCP is very unique in that it deals with much more than the traditional land use and zoning issues that are found in an OCP. Together, the ten key priority areas represent the community's vision for an environmentally, socially and economically sustainable community.
The community is now being provided an opportunity to review and provide input to the draft OCP. City staff have already made presentations to a variety of groups in the community and many more presentations are planned for the weeks to come. In addition, staff will be attending a number of high-traffic public areas in order to reach members of the community who might not otherwise particpate in a structured consultation process.
The City of Williams Lake web site has a link to the draft OCP and the community is encouraged to review the document and provide their input.
An OCP is a legislated requirement that helps guide land use and other strategic decisions so that development takes place in a deliberate and sustainable manner. Given the broad scope of this OCP and the high level of public particpation, this plan should assist City Coucnil and the community in making sound, sustainable decisions in the future.
Thursday, February 10, 2011
Closed Meetings of Council
Questions sometimes arise with respect to Council going into 'Closed' or "In-Camera' meetings and I felt it was appropriate to provide some facts around Closed meetings and the use of this legislative provision to conduct Council business. Section 90(1) of the Community Charter allows part of a council meeting to be closed to the public if the subject matter being considered relates to or is one or more of the following:
(a) personal information about an identifiable individual who holds or is being considered for a position as an officer, employee or agent of the municipality or another position appointed by the municipality;
(b) personal information about an identifiable individual who is being considered for a municipal award or honour, or who has offered to provide a gift to the municipality on condition of anonymity;
(c) labour relations or other employee relations;
(d) the security of the property of the municipality;
(e) the acquisition, disposition or expropriation of land or improvements, if the council considers that disclosure could reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the municipality;
(f) law enforcement, if the council considers that disclosure could reasonably be expected to harm the conduct of an investigation under or enforcement of an enactment;
(g) litigation or potential litigation affecting the municipality;
(h) an administrative tribunal hearing or potential administrative tribunal hearing affecting the municipality, other than a hearing to be conducted by the council or a delegate of council;
(i) the receipt of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose;
(j) information that is prohibited, or information that if it were presented in a document would be prohibited, from disclosure under section 21 of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act;
(k) negotiations and related discussions respecting the proposed provision of a municipal service that are at their preliminary stages and that, in the view of the council, could reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the municipality if they were held in public;
(l) discussions with municipal officers and employees respecting municipal objectives, measures and progress reports for the purposes of preparing an annual report under section 98 [annual municipal report];
(m) a matter that, under another enactment, is such that the public may be excluded from the meeting;
(n) the consideration of whether a council meeting should be closed under a provision of this subsection or subsection (2);
(o) the consideration of whether the authority under section 91 [other persons attending closed meetings] should be exercised in relation to a council meeting.
Given the range of circumstances that could or would require a matter to be considered in a closed meeting, they can be a fairly common occurrence. However, placing items on a closed meeting agenda is not done so lightly and each and every item is carefully assessed against the legislated criteria by the CAO and Corporate Officer. The most common items that go to closed meetings include employee relations, appointments of individuals to committees/awards, disposition of land and litigation issues. In many cases, the resolutions of Council from a closed meeting are brought forward to regular agendas for the public record. However, there are items such as employee relations or litigation that are not made public due to the need for personal or legal confidentiality.
Public perceptions of Council "doing business behind closed doors" when they are in closed meetings are common. However, it is the role of the CAO and Corporate Officer to ensure that closed meeting items meet the criteria of the Community Charter and provide advice to Council with respect to those items that should be brought forward for the public record.
(a) personal information about an identifiable individual who holds or is being considered for a position as an officer, employee or agent of the municipality or another position appointed by the municipality;
(b) personal information about an identifiable individual who is being considered for a municipal award or honour, or who has offered to provide a gift to the municipality on condition of anonymity;
(c) labour relations or other employee relations;
(d) the security of the property of the municipality;
(e) the acquisition, disposition or expropriation of land or improvements, if the council considers that disclosure could reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the municipality;
(f) law enforcement, if the council considers that disclosure could reasonably be expected to harm the conduct of an investigation under or enforcement of an enactment;
(g) litigation or potential litigation affecting the municipality;
(h) an administrative tribunal hearing or potential administrative tribunal hearing affecting the municipality, other than a hearing to be conducted by the council or a delegate of council;
(i) the receipt of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose;
(j) information that is prohibited, or information that if it were presented in a document would be prohibited, from disclosure under section 21 of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act;
(k) negotiations and related discussions respecting the proposed provision of a municipal service that are at their preliminary stages and that, in the view of the council, could reasonably be expected to harm the interests of the municipality if they were held in public;
(l) discussions with municipal officers and employees respecting municipal objectives, measures and progress reports for the purposes of preparing an annual report under section 98 [annual municipal report];
(m) a matter that, under another enactment, is such that the public may be excluded from the meeting;
(n) the consideration of whether a council meeting should be closed under a provision of this subsection or subsection (2);
(o) the consideration of whether the authority under section 91 [other persons attending closed meetings] should be exercised in relation to a council meeting.
Given the range of circumstances that could or would require a matter to be considered in a closed meeting, they can be a fairly common occurrence. However, placing items on a closed meeting agenda is not done so lightly and each and every item is carefully assessed against the legislated criteria by the CAO and Corporate Officer. The most common items that go to closed meetings include employee relations, appointments of individuals to committees/awards, disposition of land and litigation issues. In many cases, the resolutions of Council from a closed meeting are brought forward to regular agendas for the public record. However, there are items such as employee relations or litigation that are not made public due to the need for personal or legal confidentiality.
Public perceptions of Council "doing business behind closed doors" when they are in closed meetings are common. However, it is the role of the CAO and Corporate Officer to ensure that closed meeting items meet the criteria of the Community Charter and provide advice to Council with respect to those items that should be brought forward for the public record.
Monday, January 31, 2011
Why a New Fire Truck?
I always find it interesting the kinds of questions that people ask our Mayor and Councillors when they are out and about and I had originally intended to use this blog as a means to address such questions which may also be on the minds of others in the community.
The Mayor was recently asked - "Why did the City buy a new truck for the Deputy Fire Chief when the Fire Hall was over budget?"
That is an understandable question. My first response is to clarify that the money to purchase new trucks or other equipment comes from an Equipment Reserve, where funds have been set aside on an annual basis for the replacement of aging equipment. Setting funds aside ahead of time ensures that equipment can be replaced when required, without affecting the operational budget.
Secondly, there was a demonstrated need for a new truck. Currently, the pick-up trucks operated by the Fire Department are 1/2 tons with limited towing capacity. The Fire Department has a Fire Safety House and a large Hazardous Materials Response Trailer which required a larger truck to pull them safely and economically.
Furthermore, the 1/2 ton Fire Department truck which was replaced was reassigned to the Engineering Department to replace an 80's model pick-up that had reached the end of it's useful life. The truck from the Fire Department will now serve the Engineering Department well for a number of years to come, without the cost of buying a new truck for Engineering.
There is a common assumption that City vehicles are replaced on a pre-determined schedule (ie. every five years) which is not the case. The City keeps vehicles and equipment in its fleet until such time as the cost of operating and repairing them exceeds the value of purchasing a replacement. Depending on the level of use they receive, some vehicles operate in excess of 10 or 15 years, some even longer. When a new vehicle is purchased, the existing vehicle may often be reassigned to another department where it can operate under lighter duty for an additional period of time. At the end of the day, vehicles and equipment that are no longer required by the City are sold at auction or by sealed bid.
The Mayor was recently asked - "Why did the City buy a new truck for the Deputy Fire Chief when the Fire Hall was over budget?"
That is an understandable question. My first response is to clarify that the money to purchase new trucks or other equipment comes from an Equipment Reserve, where funds have been set aside on an annual basis for the replacement of aging equipment. Setting funds aside ahead of time ensures that equipment can be replaced when required, without affecting the operational budget.
Secondly, there was a demonstrated need for a new truck. Currently, the pick-up trucks operated by the Fire Department are 1/2 tons with limited towing capacity. The Fire Department has a Fire Safety House and a large Hazardous Materials Response Trailer which required a larger truck to pull them safely and economically.
Furthermore, the 1/2 ton Fire Department truck which was replaced was reassigned to the Engineering Department to replace an 80's model pick-up that had reached the end of it's useful life. The truck from the Fire Department will now serve the Engineering Department well for a number of years to come, without the cost of buying a new truck for Engineering.
There is a common assumption that City vehicles are replaced on a pre-determined schedule (ie. every five years) which is not the case. The City keeps vehicles and equipment in its fleet until such time as the cost of operating and repairing them exceeds the value of purchasing a replacement. Depending on the level of use they receive, some vehicles operate in excess of 10 or 15 years, some even longer. When a new vehicle is purchased, the existing vehicle may often be reassigned to another department where it can operate under lighter duty for an additional period of time. At the end of the day, vehicles and equipment that are no longer required by the City are sold at auction or by sealed bid.
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Reduced Crime in Williams Lake
St. Sgt. Warren Brown of the Williams Lake RCMP provided Council with a review of the 2010 crime statistics at the January 11th Council meeting and the results are nothing short of amazing. Compared to 2008, when crime appeared to be at an all-time high in Williams Lake, a majority of criminal offence categories have seen as much as an 88% reduction, with many in the 50 - 60% range. The reduction in offences corresponds with a 20% reduction in Calls for Service.
Having been the City's liaison with the RCMP for a number of years, I can offer some opinions and observations with respect to the why these numbers have decreased so dramatically. It is recognized that crime in general in down in communities throughout BC and the country. However, not anywhere near the levels of reduction we've seen in Williams Lake.
Most notably, the Williams Lake RCMP has taken a very consistent approach to dealing with the community's prolific offenders - those few individuals who are responsible for a vast majority of crime. These individuals have been provided a particularly high level of attention from our RCMP members and as a result, when they offend, they are being arrested and are receiving stronger sentences. There is a clear correlation between reduced incidents of property crime and the incarceration of prolific offenders so when these individuals are in prison, our community is much safer.
Another factor influencing crime reduction is the dedication and efforts of the numerous volunteers in our community policing programs. These volunteers spend numerous hours patrolling our streets, facilitating Restorative Justice circles, monitoring traffic speeds and providing education to the community to name a few.
In late 2008, the current Council approved funding for two civilian support positions at the Williams Lake detachment, intended to reduce some of the administrative requirements of the RCMP members, thus allowing the members to spend more time on patrol and conducting investigations. These positions have proved invaluable and in 2010, Council committed to these positions becoming long term.
These latest statistics are good news for our community and indicate a promising trend that we hope will continue in 2011.
Having been the City's liaison with the RCMP for a number of years, I can offer some opinions and observations with respect to the why these numbers have decreased so dramatically. It is recognized that crime in general in down in communities throughout BC and the country. However, not anywhere near the levels of reduction we've seen in Williams Lake.
Most notably, the Williams Lake RCMP has taken a very consistent approach to dealing with the community's prolific offenders - those few individuals who are responsible for a vast majority of crime. These individuals have been provided a particularly high level of attention from our RCMP members and as a result, when they offend, they are being arrested and are receiving stronger sentences. There is a clear correlation between reduced incidents of property crime and the incarceration of prolific offenders so when these individuals are in prison, our community is much safer.
Another factor influencing crime reduction is the dedication and efforts of the numerous volunteers in our community policing programs. These volunteers spend numerous hours patrolling our streets, facilitating Restorative Justice circles, monitoring traffic speeds and providing education to the community to name a few.
In late 2008, the current Council approved funding for two civilian support positions at the Williams Lake detachment, intended to reduce some of the administrative requirements of the RCMP members, thus allowing the members to spend more time on patrol and conducting investigations. These positions have proved invaluable and in 2010, Council committed to these positions becoming long term.
These latest statistics are good news for our community and indicate a promising trend that we hope will continue in 2011.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)